Transnational Curricula for Digital Forensics

Loading

Curricula Review

Evaluator’s Curriculum Review Form: Transnational Curriculum Development in Digital Forensics

 

Evaluator’s Information

Name:________________________________

Position/Title:  __________________________

Organization/Affiliation: _________________________________

Contact Information (Email, Phone):__________________________

Review Date:_____________________________________

 

  1. Basic Information on Curriculum

1.1. Report Title: Transnational Industry Aligned Curricula in Digital Forensics

1.2. Author(s): Dr. Inam Ullah Khan, Dr. Muhammad Usman, Prof. Dr. Tanveer Zia

1.3. Publication Date: November 30, 2023.

1.4. Institution/Organization: Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom, Naif Arab University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

1.5. Country/Region: United Kingdom (UK) and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)

interpretation of the 1-5 scale for your form

Poor  [1]- The aspect under evaluation does not meet the required standards or expectations. There are major issues that need to be addressed.

Fair [2] – The aspect under evaluation partially meets the standards or expectations but there are significant areas of improvement.

Good [3] – The aspect under evaluation meets the standards or expectations adequately. There are some areas of improvement.

Very Good [4] – The aspect under evaluation is above average and meets most standards or expectations. There are minor areas of improvement.

Excellent [5] – The aspect under evaluation exceeds standards or expectations and demonstrates exemplary performance or quality. No noticeable areas of improvement.

2. Knowledge Area

    • How effectively does the curriculum cover the breadth and depth of knowledge areas in digital forensics?

(Rate 1-5):    __________________________

2.2. Are there specific knowledge domains that require more emphasis or inclusion?

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Level of Education

3.1. To what extent does the curriculum align with the cognitive and skill development expectations for the designated educational level?

(Rate 1-5):  _______________________

3.2. Can adjustments be made to enhance the curriculum’s appropriateness for the chosen educational level?

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Content Evaluation

4.1. Are the suggested learning outcomes sufficiently clear, measurable, and aligned with industry expectations?

(Rate 1-5):  _______________________

4.2. I Do the outcomes adequately address both theoretical understanding and practical application?

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Suggested Content Outline

5.1. How well does the suggested content outline address the evolving challenges and advancements in digital forensics?

 (Rate 1-5):  _____________________

5.2. Are there specific content areas that may require updates or enhancements?(Rate 1-5):

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Suggested Tools

6.1. To what extent are the suggested tools and technologies reflective of current industry standards and best practices?

 (Rate 1-5): _______________________________

6.2. Is there a balance between foundational tools and cutting-edge technologies?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Coverage of Transnational, Industry and Interdisciplinary Aspects

7.1. How adaptable is the curriculum to diverse cultural and regional contexts while maintaining its core integrity?

(Rate 1-5):     ___________________________

7. 2. Are there specific cultural considerations that should be integrated into the curriculum?

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.3. How closely does the curriculum align with the dynamic skill requirements of the digital forensics industry?

(Rate 1-5):     ______________________________

7. 4. Are there emerging skills or industry trends that should be incorporated into the curriculum?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.5. To what extent does the curriculum encourage interdisciplinary collaboration and holistic problem-solving?

(Rate 1-5):     _____________________________

7. 6. Can improvements be made to foster stronger connections with other academic disciplines?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Related Key Standards and Guidelines

8.1. How effectively does the curriculum align with and incorporate key industry standards and guidelines?

(Rate 1-5):   _____________________________

8. 2: Are there any gaps in alignment that need to be addressed?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Indicative Content and Skill Set for Multiple Sectors

9.1. Does the indicative content and skills set adequately prepare students for the diverse demands of corporate, law enforcement, and state security sectors?

(Rate 1-5): ____________________

9.2: Are there sector-specific nuances that should be emphasized in the curriculum?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Related Certifications

10.1. How well does the curriculum prepare students for relevant certifications, and does it consider the evolving landscape of certifications in digital forensics?

(Rate 1-5): ____________________

10.2: Are there additional certification pathways that should be explored or emphasized?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  1. Key References

11.1. Are the key references comprehensive, current, and inclusive of diverse perspectives in digital forensics?

11.2: Are there additional seminal works or resources that should be integrated into the curriculum’s reference materials?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12. Future Recommendations

12.1. Suggestions for improvement: